R. v. R.B.
Client was charged with multiple counts of rape (sexual assault). We conducted a lengthy trial where the complainant was cross-examined at length. After which, R.B. was acquitted of all charges.
R. v. Ab.W.
Charged with possession for the purpose of trafficking and firearm possession charges. After successful Garofoli application, all contraband excluded, thus client walked as a free man.
R. v. O.D.H.
Client was charged with a Homicide along with two other co-accused. It was alleged that O.D.H. stabbed the victim multiple times in a vehicle with the two co- accused. Surveillance tracked the movements of defendants. There were many eye- witnesses to murder. Client was seen at a convenience store buying the murder weapon. After several pretrial motions, client charges were stayed.
R. v. I.B.
Client is a prominent physician in the GTA. He was charged with assaulting his 12-year-old daughter. After several pretrial with the crown and convincing arguments of the motive behind the allegation and weakness in the crowns case, the crown attorney withdrew the charge prior to the first court date.
R. v. K.P.
Client was charged with threatening death, several counts of assault against the complainant, assault police and obstruct peace officer. After several days of cross- examination of the crown witnesses and police officers, client was found not guilty.
R. v. K.D.
Client was charged with Attempt Murder. The allegations of the Attempt Murder was caught on surveillance at local Toronto bar. There were two other co- accused involved. After a preliminary inquiry, K.D. was discharged and all charges were dropped.
R. v. H.A.
Client was charged with gang sexual assault. After a lengthy trial, H.A. was acquitted with the judge saying: “I know your client did it, but based on the evidence you presented to this Court, I can not find him guilty.”
R. v. T.T.
This was a sexual assault and forcible confinement case. It was a lengthy judge and jury trial. We lost every pretrial motion, every objection. Client had several sexual assaults on his record, which were sanitized at trial. The trial lasted 6 weeks. Cross-examination of the complainant was undermined. After merely three hours of deliberations, the jury found T.T. not guilty.
R. v. A.F.
Client was charged with a large amount of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking. After proving to the Court that the Peel Police breached his constitutional rights, the charges were dismissed based on those breaches.
R. v. S.K.
Client charged with assault police after police entered his home for a noise complaint. It was argued that police used Excessive Force and were not in execution of their duty. All charges were stayed thereafter.
R. v. S.M.
Youth client was charged with weapons dangerous, assault, assault police, and utter threat. Complainant was one of the “mall cops” at Yorkdale Shopping Center. After pre-trial motion for Charter breaches under s. 10(b), 8, 9, 7 and Excessive Force, client’s charges were dismissed.
R. v. S.R.
Client charged with several counts of trafficking laundry list of drugs. He had prior breaches of court orders and similar items of convictions of related charges on his criminal record accumulated with his prior counsel. After pretrial motions, crown attorney stayed all charges.