Notable Cases

R v S.N.

Client charged with possession of a firearm in Brampton. Client was in a vehicle that the police searched after claiming a ride stop that resulted in the "smell" of marijuana. All charges dismissed.

R v Z.H.

Client charged with possession of a firearm and several charges of possession of illegal drugs for the purpose of trafficking. Client also charged with thousands of dollars of proceeds of crime. It was successfully argued that more than half of the thousands of dollars was not as a result of proceeds of crime. All charges withdrawn against the client. And most of the proceeds were returned, as not being proceeds of crime, nor forfeited as proceeds of crime.

R v A.CB

Client charged with possession of a firearm in a motor vehicle. Charge withdrawn

R v S.N.

Client charged with 13 counts of firearm related charges. He was arrested in a vehicle on a warrantless search. After several pretrials and proving the crown lack a reasonable prospect of conviction, all charges were withdrawn.

R v K.McK.

Client charged pursuant to a CDSA search warrant with copious amounts of various drugs. Client faced significant penitentiary time. After successful challenge to the warrant, all charges for trafficking illegal drugs and possession of illegal drugs were withdrawn.

R v R.McL.

Client charged with trafficking illegal drugs out of a hotel room. Windsor police surveillance provided corroboration, according to police, for judicial authorization to search that hotel room. Client arrested for numerous counts of trafficking illegal substances. After successful negotiation, all charges were withdrawn. 

R v S.H.

Client charged with trafficking illegal substances, proceeds, and possession of a firearm. Client also charged with massive amount of proceeds found in a lockbox. After several pretrials, all charges withdrawn and funds returned to client. 

R v A.B.

Client charged with numerous counts of trafficking drugs and proceeds. All charges withdrawn. 

R v R.S.

Client charged with 52 counts of robbery with a firearm of pharmacies all over Peel. All charges withdrawn.

R v C.R.

Client charged with possession for the purpose of trafficking in Barrie from a stash house. After successful negotiation, all charges withdrawn.

R v S.B.

Client charged with robbery with a restricted loaded firearm. Client acquitted.

R. v. P.V.

Client was charged with 7 counts of intimate partner violence related charges including weapon related charges. After trial, where Ms. Gupta cross-examined the Crown witnesses at length, the judge acquitted her client of all charges. This is significant given that the client is a pharmacist and risked consequences in his profession if he was found guilty. Justice prevailed for him through the strong advocacy of his lawyer.