R. v. T.C.
Client was charged with possession of firearm and assault with a firearm, point firearm, etc. Cross-examination of the complainant, who was one of the ‘johns’ who proceeded to pay for sexual services from another witness testified. The complainant was an older gentleman who was trying to hide why he was at the house. He claimed that client robbed him of the money. After several days of cross-examination, the crown realized there was no reasonable prospect of conviction and withdrew all charges against client.
R. v. S.S.
Client charged with possession of firearm. After several constitutional arguments for breaches of client’s s. 10(a), 10(b), 8, and 9, client’s charges were dismissed.
R. v. T. J.
Client was in his parked car outside an LCBO with his buddy. Peel Police were surveilling him. They stopped him under the guise of a traffic infraction. They detained and arrested him for simple possession of Marijuana based on the smell of it. They dragged him out of the car and brought K9 unit to look for drugs and a firearm. He was charged with trafficking cocaine, marijuana and heroin. We conducted a lengthy trial. All drugs were excluded pursuant to a breach of his constitutional rights by the Peel Police. Charges dismissed.
R. v. J.W.
Client was charged with a stranger rape (sexual assault). After pretrial motion to exclude the incriminating, inculpatory statement, we proceeded to trial. Complainant lies were shown after cross-examination. Client was acquitted after trial.
R. v. M.M.
Client was charged with assault in jail and assault correctional officers. Part of the assault was caught on surveillance in the jail institution. Client was found not guilty after lengthy and aggressive cross-examination of the crown witnesses and correctional officers.
R. v. M.S.
Youth client charged with robbery. After trial, client found not guilty.
R. v. M.D.
Youth client was charged with assault in school with other co-accused. Several witnesses came forward. After cross examination of the witnesses and complainant, client was acquitted.
R. v. B.M.M.
Client was charged with assaulting police by punching the police officer in the face allegedly. Client was also charged with mischief under in banging the windows of the scout car causing damage. Several police officers were at the scene. One tased and assaulted client. After aggressive cross-examination of the main officers at the scene, there was reasonable doubt and inconsistencies in the officers’ evidence resulting in client being found not guilty.
R. v. N.S.
Client was charged with possession of firearm found in his car. After Charter pretrial motions, gun was excluded.
R. v. R.R.
Client was charged with several counts of large amounts of money laundering and fraud. After several discussions with the Crown Attorney and Judge and pretrials, Client’s charges were stayed.
R. v. T.D.
Client was charged with trafficking cocaine and marijuana and drive dangerous. Several pretrial motions were brought. Drugs were excluded. Trial was for dangerous operation. Client was found not guilty.
R. v. S.S.
Client was charged with possession of firearm. After constitutional arguments made, firearm was excluded and thus charges dismissed.