Notable Cases

R. v. J.D.

Client was charged with several counts of armed bank robberies all over the GTA, Manitoba and B.C. This was a project case involving other co-accused. After several arguments before the Court, all charges were stayed.

R. v. H.B.

Client charged with trafficking cocaine, human trafficking, robbery. Conducted several pre-trial motions. Cross-examined several girls alleged to have been human trafficked. After lengthy trial, client was acquitted of all charges.

R. v. T.G.

Client was charged with aggravated assault, attempt murder, and several counts of assault. Surveillance showed T.G. amongst others at a shooting at a bar in Toronto. After a week long trial, Mr. T.G. was acquitted.

R. v. D.K.

Client was charged with tossing a firearm (possession of firearm related charges) and possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking. Based on s. 8 and 9 of the Charter, all charges were dropped.

R. v. E.E.

Client was charged with child abduction. After cross-examination of the complainant, there were serious doubts raised on the elements of the offence. Crown folded and dropped the charges.

R. v. S.M.

Client was charged with spitting at a correctional officer. This was caught on surveillance allegedly. Client was charged with assault inside the correctional officers wagon of prisoners with another prisoner. There was no surveillance inside the wagon, but there was of the wagon moving up and down as if there was movement inside. The complainant (another prisoner) did not testify at the trial. The correctional officers were cross-examined based on the surveillance. After several days of evidence, client was found not guilty.

R. v. F.E.

Client was charged with domestic assault with children as witnesses. After trial, and cross-examination of the child witnesses and the complainant, client was acquitted.

R. v. T.L.

Client charged with possession of firearm related charges. Police were called to a house party due to a noise complaint. They illegally entered the home and proceeded to search all the people in that house. Several people were arrested for various charges. Several pretrial motions were brought for breach of client’s constitutional rights. After success at said pretrial motions, the charges were dismissed.

R. v. N.A.

Client charged with domestic assault against his wife and two of his children. Conducted a lengthy trial. Client was acquitted of all charges before the Court.

R. v. P.M.

Client charged with aggravated assault, assault, utter death threat caught on camera. Several co-accused involved. After trial, client was found not guilty on all charges.

R. v. L.M.

Client charged with human trafficking, sexual assault, and possession for the purpose of trafficking cocaine and heroin. Conducted a lengthy preliminary inquiry. All charges were discharged against only client, not the co-accused.

R. v. R.B.

Charges were a series of domestic assaults. Police fail to provide SOCO photos of client’s injuries and claim to have “lost” the complainant’s SOCO photos. The police said it was not in bad faith. After successfully winning on the “Lost Evidence” Application under s. 7 Charter breach, client was acquitted of all charges.